(A) Surface representation of MERS\CoV RBD with the binding epitope of Fab MERS\27 shown in salmon and the overlapping DPP4 carbohydrate\binding epitope in blue (distance cutoff of 4

(A) Surface representation of MERS\CoV RBD with the binding epitope of Fab MERS\27 shown in salmon and the overlapping DPP4 carbohydrate\binding epitope in blue (distance cutoff of 4.5 ?). molecular mimicking of glycan receptors by antibodies is rare and further demonstrate that antibodies often partly overlap or bind sufficiently close to the receptor\binding region to hinder access to this site, achieving neutralization partially because of the epitope location and partly due to their sheer size. Keywords: glycan receptors, viruses, neutralizing antibodies, structural characterization of binding epitopes and modes Introduction The attachment of a virus to its cognate host cell receptor is the first step of viral infection and serves as a key determinant of host specificity, tissue tropism and pathogenicity. For some viruses, a single receptor is sufficient to promote infection, while others require additional attachment factors or co\receptors for cell entry. Cell\surface carbohydrates linked to proteins or lipids are often\used receptors, and they are recognized by numerous viruses to facilitate attachment and entry. The carbohydrates that are typically hijacked by viruses can be grouped into three classes: sialylated carbohydrates, glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), and histo\blood group antigens (HBGAs). The glycosylation of a protein can also help mediating receptor recognition. Sialylated carbohydrates are ubiquitously expressed among vertebrates and RR6 engaged by numerous viruses including influenza viruses, orthoreoviruses, human coronaviruses (CoVs) and adenoviruses. These glycans contain sialic acids, which are usually found at the termini of the branches of N\glycans, O\glycans, and glycosphingolipids, and they display a high level of diversity. This diversity arises from possible sialic acid modifications such as acetylation, methylation, hydroxylation, and sulfation in addition to different glycosidici linkage types that connect sialic acids to subsequent carbohydrate residues in the chain. Although 2,3 and 2,6 glycosidic linkages to galactose (Gal) or N\acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) are the most common types found in these sialoglycan structures. To some degree, virus host range specificity can be determined by the glycosidic linkage type, as seen for example in influenza viruses.1, 2, 3 GAGs represent another class of virus glycan receptors or RR6 attachment factors and are recognized by, for example, herpesviruses and papillomaviruses. These linear polysaccharides are built from repeating units of 1 1,4\linked disaccharides, which contain an N\acetylated or N\sulfated amino sugar and an uronic acid or Gal unit. 4 Prominent examples for GAGs are chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate. Typically, several GAG chains are covalently attached via serine residues to a core protein, and together they form proteoglycans, which are produced by virtually all mammalian cells.4 An important characteristic of GAGs is their overall negative charge, conferred by non\stoichiometric sulfation and the uronic acid carboxy groups. HBGAs, on the other hand, are neutral terminal carbohydrate structures of lipid\ or protein\linked glycan chains that can function as viral attachment factors for noroviruses and human rotaviruses, for example. These glycans are expressed on most epithelial cells and erythrocytes, and they are also secreted into saliva and other body fluids. Their biosynthesis is carried out through RR6 stepwise addition of monosaccharides by specific glycosyltransferases (Fig. ?(Fig.11).5 Presence or absence of functional glycosyltransferase genes leads to different HBGA phenotypes among humans, leading to differences in susceptibility for certain virus strains. Open in a separate window Figure 1 Glycan types that can Rabbit polyclonal to ESD function as viral receptors. (A) Biosynthesis of human ABH and Lewis HBGAs of Types 1 and 2. The types are described with the glycosidic linkage from the precursor (Type 1 is normally 1,3 and Type 2 is normally RR6 1,4 connected). Each stage from the synthesis is normally catalyzed by way of a particular glycosyltransferase. FUT2 and FUT1 gene items control exactly the same response. FUT1 is normally portrayed in erythrocytes and FUT2 in secretory tissue offering rise to its glycosidic item in saliva and mucosal secretions. Sequential addition of monosaccharides towards the precursor leads to secretor\HBGAs within the presence also to non\secretor Lewis types in lack of FUT2 in secretions. FUT3 is normally primarily expressed within the epithelial cells of gastrointestinal tissues and provides a fucose towards the precursor or H\type antigens. Enzyme A or enzyme B provides Gal or GalNAc via 1,3 linkages to H\type antigens, respectively, producing a and B type HBGAs. For example H type 1 is normally shown within a structural representation. (B) Sialic acidity variations. Sialic acids terminate.